Re: [Potential Malicious Mail]Re: Query: Storing DID Documents on Centralized Platforms

so anyone with access to that storage could change the did doc, unless the particular method itself requires the doc to be signed by a/the controller. I think did:web is vulnerable and there may be others.

Sent from Nine<http://www.9folders.com/>

________________________________
Van: Chaals Nevile <charles.nevile@consensys.net>
verzonden: woensdag 14 februari 2024 03:42
Aan: Vigas Deep; public-did-wg@w3.org
Onderwerp: [Potential Malicious Mail]Re: Query: Storing DID Documents on Centralized Platforms


Hello Vigas,

a DID document is just a document, and the specifications make no
particular demands on storage. So you can store it as and how you please.

cheers

On Wednesday, February 7, 2024 19:36:07 (+01:00), Vigas Deep wrote:

 > Hello people,
 >
 > Our team is exploring storage options for DID Documents and is
considering
 > platforms like Google Drive or GitHub alongside IPFS. Could you please
 > advise if storing DID Documents on such centralized platforms complies
with
 > DID standards?
 >
 > Thank you for your guidance.
 >
 > Best regards,
 >

--
Charles 'Chaals' Nevile
Lead Standards Architect, ConsenSys Inc

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.