- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:32:17 -0500
- To: W3C DID Working Group <public-did-wg@w3.org>
Hi all, A number of people that are going to be on the DID Formal Objection Council have asked us to prepare material that will help them deliberate. I've been updating a FAQ on the DID Formal Objections over the past several months here: https://msporny.github.io/did-core-formal-objections/ During the last DID WG call, I requested that it is transferred to the DID WG to enable others to clarify/fix/update anything that seems like it's not aligned with DID WG consensus (there are a few things that probably need to be toned down in the FAQ). To be clear, this would have an even lesser status than a NOTE... it's just reading material for the FO Council, managed by the DID WG. The suggestion is that we provide this material to the DID Core Formal Objection Council as supplementary material (in addition to the status update to the FO Council sent in the previous email). Would anyone object to transferring the FAQ to be managed under the DID WG? Feels like this can just be a Chair/Staff call since we're not going to publish it. -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021) https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2021 18:32:34 UTC