Re: did:did - DID Identity DID (DID) DID method

Bug reports:
1. As a user, I would expect the “identity” method to be idempotent
2. As another user, I would expect undid and did to commute, which is not
necessarily the case at the moment

We’re getting there guys, keep pushing!

On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 8:16 AM Markus Sabadello <markus@danubetech.com>
wrote:

> Okay.. So this is just for fun, or could it actually serve a concrete
> purpose (even if it's some edge case)?
>
> I'd maybe add a sentence to the spec to clarify this... It looks cool :)
> But the motivation wasn't quite clear to me...
>
> Markus
>
> On 02.04.21 15:47, Charles E. Lehner wrote:
> > For further reference - this was aimed at following this IETF tradition:
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day_RFC
> >
>
>