- From: Wayne Chang <wyc@fastmail.fm>
- Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 12:42:13 -0400
- To: "Markus Sabadello" <markus@danubetech.com>, "W3C DID Working Group" <public-did-wg@w3.org>
I think it could help demonstrate a few things: 1. The flexibility of DID methods for better or for worse 2. A way to circumvent simple access control lists that work on exact string matching to deny specific DIDs 3. Composed DID methods that ultimately rely upon other DID methods On Fri, Apr 2, 2021, at 11:15 AM, Markus Sabadello wrote: > Okay.. So this is just for fun, or could it actually serve a concrete > purpose (even if it's some edge case)? > > I'd maybe add a sentence to the spec to clarify this... It looks cool :) > But the motivation wasn't quite clear to me... > > Markus > > On 02.04.21 15:47, Charles E. Lehner wrote: > > For further reference - this was aimed at following this IETF tradition: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day_RFC > > > >
Received on Friday, 2 April 2021 16:42:47 UTC