- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 14:14:12 -0400
- To: public-did-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <0d6b1cea-f7d5-b546-04a8-d9b7f466d33c@openlinksw.com>
On 6/30/20 3:40 PM, Orie Steele wrote: > > That being said, I think did:peer could be an excellent candidate for > a JSON-Only did method... because it's designed to be private and NOT > be linked data, in the > traditional sense... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_data Hi Orie, There is nothing about Linked Data that implies the public or private state of anything. You can happily enjoy the power of Linked Data within an Intranet, which has been the case for a very long time i.e., you must have hyperlinks in your organization that only resolve behind your corporate firewall, right? -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com Community Support: https://community.openlinksw.com Weblogs (Blogs): Company Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-software-blog Virtuoso Blog: https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog Data Access Drivers Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-odbc-jdbc-ado-net-data-access-drivers Personal Weblogs (Blogs): Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen Legacy Blogs: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/ http://kidehen.blogspot.com Profile Pages: Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/ Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Web Identities (WebID): Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/public_home/kidehen/profile.ttl#i : http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2020 18:14:29 UTC