Re: F2F at TPAC 2017 this year?

Thank you, Anssi,

I agree that a dedicated workshop would be a great idea. I would also like
to express an intention to attend and perhaps even contribute on the S&P
side.

I'm just wondering - do you think there would be options for funding the
travel/etc?
Any idea where the workshop is to be held?

Best
Lukasz

2017-05-11 11:07 GMT+02:00 Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>:

> > On 11 May 2017, at 11:47, Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > 2017-05-08 1:08 GMT+02:00 Tobie Langel <tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com>:
> >
> >
> > > > One of the reasons for a F2F is to  see if we can have implementers
> in the SF area to attend and have a working session, as well as encouraging
> wider W3C member participation in our work. We also should think about
> which joint meetings would be useful - suggestions?  (Privacy and Security
> interest groups are two).
> > > >
> > > > Please note thoughts or concerns on the list before 1 May. Earlier
> is better.
> > >
> > > I think a F2F also this year at TPAC would be time well spent. In
> > > particular, the close proximity to the Bay Area companies means we
> might
> > > be able to attract new participants and implementers to the meeting. I
> > > expect the various sensor deliverables [1] to be the main topic of
> > > discussion.
> > >
> > > The recurring theme around sensors seems to be privacy and security,
> so a
> > > joint meeting with the domain experts in that field sounds like a good
> > > idea.
> >
> > I'm highly supportive of this idea.
> >
> > Would be an interesting idea, although people versed in the topic are
> pretty much on both continents ;-)
>
> [[
>
> Please note that we have decided not to have a WG meeting at TPAC 2017.
>
> We are considering a workshop in Europe along with an associated WG
> meeting instead.
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2017May/0004.html
>
> ]]
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Anssi