- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 09:07:10 +0000
- To: "Lukasz Olejnik (W3C)" <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com>
- CC: "tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com" <tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com>, "W3C Device APIs WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
> On 11 May 2017, at 11:47, Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2017-05-08 1:08 GMT+02:00 Tobie Langel <tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com>: > > > > > One of the reasons for a F2F is to see if we can have implementers in the SF area to attend and have a working session, as well as encouraging wider W3C member participation in our work. We also should think about which joint meetings would be useful - suggestions? (Privacy and Security interest groups are two). > > > > > > Please note thoughts or concerns on the list before 1 May. Earlier is better. > > > > I think a F2F also this year at TPAC would be time well spent. In > > particular, the close proximity to the Bay Area companies means we might > > be able to attract new participants and implementers to the meeting. I > > expect the various sensor deliverables [1] to be the main topic of > > discussion. > > > > The recurring theme around sensors seems to be privacy and security, so a > > joint meeting with the domain experts in that field sounds like a good > > idea. > > I'm highly supportive of this idea. > > Would be an interesting idea, although people versed in the topic are pretty much on both continents ;-) [[ Please note that we have decided not to have a WG meeting at TPAC 2017. We are considering a workshop in Europe along with an associated WG meeting instead. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2017May/0004.html ]] Thanks, -Anssi
Received on Thursday, 11 May 2017 09:07:43 UTC