- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 01:08:01 +0200
- To: public-device-apis@w3.org
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017, at 14:36, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote: > > On 06 Apr 2017, at 18:23, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com> wrote: > > The W3C will be having TPAC 6-10 November 2017 in Burlingame CA (outside San Francisco). > > > > https://www.w3.org/2017/11/TPAC/Overview.html > > > > As a group we need to decide whether to hold a F2F meeting in conjunction with TPAC and let W3C know which days we prefer. > > > > The suggestion we discussed on today's teleconference is to have a F2F Thursday-Friday, 9-10 November 2017 (since there is a conflict with the WebRTC F2F on Monday/Tuesday). As mentioned during our previous call, whether I'm able to join TPAC will depend on: 1. available funding for me to do so, 2. clarity as to the state of protection of my privacy when crossing the US border. > > One of the reasons for a F2F is to see if we can have implementers in the SF area to attend and have a working session, as well as encouraging wider W3C member participation in our work. We also should think about which joint meetings would be useful - suggestions? (Privacy and Security interest groups are two). > > > > Please note thoughts or concerns on the list before 1 May. Earlier is better. > > I think a F2F also this year at TPAC would be time well spent. In > particular, the close proximity to the Bay Area companies means we might > be able to attract new participants and implementers to the meeting. I > expect the various sensor deliverables [1] to be the main topic of > discussion. > > The recurring theme around sensors seems to be privacy and security, so a > joint meeting with the domain experts in that field sounds like a good > idea. I'm highly supportive of this idea. --tobie
Received on Sunday, 7 May 2017 23:08:29 UTC