- From: Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:03:49 +0100
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>, Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAC1M5qp-yOpNvN3rGVs7O2SBb7Ow9Y44YFjmZgMMbSezTU5r8Q@mail.gmail.com>
2016-02-29 22:58 GMT+01:00 David Singer <singer@apple.com>: > > > On Feb 29, 2016, at 13:53 , Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > 2016-02-29 22:47 GMT+01:00 Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>: > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:37 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> So, is this API a fingerprint risk, or a beacon risk? > > >> > > >> It provides information > > > > > > that’s my puzzle. it provides almost no information at all. what > information does it provide? > > > > > > it can transmit information (e.g. the vibrate pattern), it can > identify a device ‘in a crowd’, and so on, but… > > > > I think this is semantic confusion. Lukasz here seems to be saying > > through the API a developer provides vibration patterns to the device > > which vibrates according to those patterns. So these are beacon > > facilitating risks (a cookie value could be marshaled into a set of > > vibration patterns and then picked up acoustically by another device > > to register the first device was in acoustic proximity) > > > > Actually, what I mean israther - probing accelerometer/gyroscope/etc > sensors, which are known to differ from each others. This is basically an > extraction of an identifier. Quintessential fingerprinting. > > "reading the output of > accelerometer - can allow fingerprinting by imperfections in the > accelerometer sensors.” > > That’s fingerprinting the accelerometers. Yes. But to probe it, one needs an "excitation factor". That's why we say: "in conjunction" Vibration API can act as one. > I suppose it’s theoretically possible that the vibration actuators — or > the combination of a specific actuator and a specific accelerometer set — > can be unique, i.e. yield a fingerprint, but I am a little doubtful. > I'm unsure this would be a real risk. > > I just want to be careful we don’t cause confusion by labelling what is > essentially an output-only API as something that can yield information… > It cannot - from the web site perspective. > > > > > > > > -- > > Joseph Lorenzo Hall > > Chief Technologist, Center for Democracy & Technology [ > https://www.cdt.org] > > e: joe@cdt.org, p: 202.407.8825, pgp: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key > > Fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10 1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871 > > > > CDT's annual dinner, Tech Prom, is April 6, 2016! > https://cdt.org/annual-dinner > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > >
Received on Monday, 29 February 2016 22:04:19 UTC