- From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 13:50:58 +0000
- To: public-device-apis@w3.org
Yeah. So going through [the constructor algorithm](https://w3c.github.io/sensors/#sensor-constructor) I remembered why I had closed this: without an identifiable underlying hardware sensor, the default behavior is to throw a `TypeError` (see step 6). So I guess it's smarter to turn that algorithm into an abstract operation and remove the constructor altogether even if the current outcome would be exactly the same. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tobie Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/19#issuecomment-180367112 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 5 February 2016 13:51:09 UTC