Re: [vibration] Returning false if vibration hardware is not present?

On 03/02/2016 14:55, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
> I think we should figure out what is involved with the PER and if
> truly lightweight, go for it, to mitigate the concern that the errata
> are not read.
>
> Lets see what Dom has to say when he has a chance.

I think a PER is appropriate; if it is too heavyweight for these small 
changes, that will be useful feedback to the AB :)

The only issue is that I won't have any cycle to look into this until March.

Dom

Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2016 14:08:11 UTC