- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:08:02 +0100
- To: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Cc: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Philip Rogers <pdr@chromium.org>, Nick Doty <npdoty@ischool.berkeley.edu>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On 03/02/2016 14:55, Frederick Hirsch wrote: > I think we should figure out what is involved with the PER and if > truly lightweight, go for it, to mitigate the concern that the errata > are not read. > > Lets see what Dom has to say when he has a chance. I think a PER is appropriate; if it is too heavyweight for these small changes, that will be useful feedback to the AB :) The only issue is that I won't have any cycle to look into this until March. Dom
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2016 14:08:11 UTC