Re: DAP-ISSUE-171: Returning false if vibration hardware is not present or using hasVibration? (prefer promises) [Vibration API] from Kostiainen, Anssi on 2016-02-02 (public-device-apis@w3.org from February 2016)

From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:16:27 +0000
To: "Lukasz Olejnik (W3C)" <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com>
CC: Device APIs Working Group <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5BD8EA3E-CA32-492F-8641-8B9FB4C16CBC@intel.com>

> On 01 Feb 2016, at 00:31, Lukasz Olejnik (W3C) <lukasz.w3c@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> But won't it allow differentiation between various hardwares/settings, based on this method?
> If so, we can consider documenting it.

You're right in that the most likely reason false is returned is that the vibration hardware is not present. This should be noted in the errata. Feel free to propose text.

Thanks,

-Anssi

Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2016 14:17:01 UTC