Re: [sensors] Conformance requirements for concrete specs

Yeah, I guess my main question was whether this needed to be formal 
(in the sense of saying something silly like: "compliant extension 
specifications must do X"), or keep it informal (and thus 
non-normative) but use rfc2119 words anyway (for example, specs SHOULD
 expose low level sensors, spec MUST define a corresponding 
SensorReading subclass, etc.).

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tobie
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/84#issuecomment-177910358 using 
your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 1 February 2016 10:51:32 UTC