- From: Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:10:09 +0000
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- CC: W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi Anssi & all, I just created some Vibration tests at https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/1224, please help review them. http://w3c-test.org/submissions/1224/vibration/cancel-when-hidden-manual.html http://w3c-test.org/submissions/1224/vibration/invalid-values.html These tests shall fulfill the gaps mentioned by the TODO.txt reflecting the latest spec. http://w3c-test.org/submissions/1224/vibration/cancel-with-array-0-manual.html This test shall address the feedback at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2014Jul/0059.html ... of treating navigator.vibrate([0]) as a cancellation, which is also added into the latest spec. Thanks, Zhiqiang > -----Original Message----- > From: Kostiainen, Anssi > Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 15:59 > To: Zhang, Zhiqiang > Cc: W3C Device APIs WG > Subject: Re: Vibration test update (Re ACTION-701: DAP testing status) > > On 22 Aug 2014, at 06:51, Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com> wrote: > > > Sorry for missing this mail. > > > >> From: Kostiainen, Anssi > >> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 16:38 > >> To: Zhang, Zhiqiang > >> Cc: W3C Device APIs WG > >> Subject: Re: Vibration test update (Re ACTION-701: DAP testing status) > >> > >> Hi Zhiqiang, > >> > >> On 14 Jul 2014, at 10:19, Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> ... we still miss tests for > >>> > >>> - do nothing when hidden > >>> - cancel when dynamically hidden > >>> - reinstate when dynamically shown > >>> - invalid values > >>> > >>> If you have tests for these checkpoints or want to write some, feel free > to > >> submit them to > >>> > >>> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/vibration > >> > >> Please feel free to write test cases for these (I guess "reinstate..." can be > >> dropped due to changes in the spec since the TODO was written), I'm > happy > >> to review them. > > > > OK, thank you. I will create some tests soon. > > Thanks for volunteering. If you have any questions, please ping this list. > > All - feel free to review the existing test suite, and suggest additional test > cases to be added to the above list if you identify further testable assertions. > > >> As discussed, despite you being the Test Facilitator, we can still relax the > >> rules in such a way that also you can write tests as long as someone else > >> reviews them before you integrate them. > > > > Absolutely yes. > > Thanks, > > -Anssi
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 08:10:48 UTC