Re: CfC: publish Battery API as CR, respond by 12 November (next Wednesday)

Anssi

Much thanks. I have make the transition request.

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2014OctDec/0143.html (members only)

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Chair DAP
@fjhirsch



On Nov 14, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Frederick,
> 
>> On 05 Nov 2014, at 18:32, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com> wrote:
>> 
>> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish “Battery API" as a Candidate Recommendation (CR) working draft, with no features marked as 'at risk' , with the exit criteria of two independent implementations of all features, and a CR end date of 8 weeks after publication as the earliest possible  date for PR transition. 
>> 
>> The editors draft is at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/default/battery/Overview.html
>> 
>> The Last Call has been completed and there was one comment which was resolved [1].
>> 
>> Please send all comments regarding this CfC to the public-device-apis@w3.org mail list by 12 November (next Wednesday). Silence will be considered as agreement. If you support this CfC, a positive response is preferred and encouraged (even a +1 will be useful).
>> 
>> Assuming no issues and a successful transition request, I would anticipate publication 9 December 2014 and with crEnd at 3 February 2015, but we might agree to adjust these dates.
> 
> I've prepared a snapshot for "W3C Candidate Recommendation 09 December 2014" release:
> 
>  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/default/battery/CR2.html
> 
> Source diff to previous published version:
> 
>  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/diff/ad52df58c238/battery/Overview.src.html
> 
> HTML diff to previous published version (linked from the SotD):
> 
>  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/default/battery/CR2-diff.html
> 
> Added to the SotD:
> 
> [[
> 
> No substantial changes have been made since the W3C Last Call Working Draft 28 August 2014.
> 
> The CR exit criterion is two interoperable deployed implementations of each feature. No features are marked as 'at-risk'.
> 
> ]]
> 
> The document passes pubrules, link checker.
> 
> Please review and let us know if further changes are needed before TranReq.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Anssi
> 
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/43696/WD-battery-status-20140828/doc/
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 14 November 2014 17:08:50 UTC