- From: Marcos <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 15:25:12 -0400
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>, Mats Wichmann <m.wichmann@samsung.com>
On May 28, 2014 at 1:56:08 PM, Marcos Caceres (w3c@marcosc.com) wrote: > > > On May 28, 2014 at 12:39:55 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux (dom@w3.org) wrote: > > > If it isn't, I'm not sure it's worth going through the trouble > > of > > declaring a wake lock API; we might as well just have a declarative > > toggle. > > > This might also be a good option too (we should add that to the list of proposals). However, > the declarative model doesn't address the use case of locking on a "as needed" basis - > specially at the manifest level. Quickly documented the declarative proposal: https://github.com/w3c/screen-wake/blob/gh-pages/README.md#declarative-option It's rough, so please feel free to fix up! Hopefully there are a few more proposals forthcoming. This has been really helpful, I think.
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2014 19:25:41 UTC