W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > July 2014

Re: [battery] Should getBattery() always return the same promise?

From: Rick Waldron <waldron.rick@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 17:12:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHfnhfoDjv+si0hW+G=AZtM+awyhxJ8LqDpiJx8z9HF06tAX+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
Cc: Tim Volodine <timvolodine@google.com>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Domenic Denicola <
domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:

>  Rick, Chromium has a multi-process architecture, whereas Firefox in
> general keeps most things in a single process. Thus Firefox has the ability
> to implement many more things synchronously than Chromium does.
> Implementation experience based on a single vendor

There are two implementations. Firefox and Tizen.

>  is not terribly valuable in guiding API surface, especially in questions
> of sync vs. async, and especially when that vendor is Firefox (the only
> single-process modern browser, from what I understand).

Battery status, especially a consolidated "virtual" status, doesn't change
depending on number of processes used by an application.

Received on Friday, 4 July 2014 21:13:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:10 UTC