- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:02:11 +0000
- To: <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Anssi Thanks for creating the LC draft - one update is needed - the date should be changed to Feb 11, and the LC end date to 4 March. we changed the dates after the call thanks regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Jan 31, 2014, at 8:17 AM, ext Kostiainen, Anssi wrote: > Hi, > > On 30 Jan 2014, at 16:47, Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com wrote: > >> Thanks Anssi >> >> One suggestion, change the status text from "Allow concurrent invocations in different browsing contexts" to "Specify how concurrent invocations in different browsing contexts are handled” > > Thanks for the suggestion. Changed. > >> When we publish you will need to prepare a draft for publication with LC status as opposed to ED status, with pubrules, link and validity checks. > > Updated the status to LC, passes checkers. > >> I suggest we plan to publish 4 Feb (if that works for you and the team) with a 3 week last call, ending 25 February. > > Updated. > >> We also should probably include a link to the test case and implementation information (I'm not sure but think there are ReSpec variables for these) >> >> tests: https://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/vibration/ > > Added. > >> informative implementation information: http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/ImplementationStatus#Vibration_API > > Added. > > [Btw. Is there a guideline how such information should be represented in W3C specs? The HTML spec has implementation status per each feature inline.] > >> we can discuss on call to confirm WG agrees on these details. > > The LC snapshot is at: > > http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/LC3.html > > [Identical with http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/Overview.html referred to in the CfC.] > > Thanks, > > -Anssi
Received on Friday, 31 January 2014 14:03:34 UTC