W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > January 2014

Re: [admin] Agenda - Distributed Meeting 30 January 2014

From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:17:29 +0000
To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
CC: "<public-device-apis@w3.org>" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1F6F3885-EB18-4813-8267-2C858BA5BA94@intel.com>

On 30 Jan 2014, at 16:47, Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com wrote:

> Thanks Anssi
> One suggestion, change the status text from "Allow concurrent invocations in different browsing contexts" to "Specify how concurrent invocations in different browsing contexts are handled”

Thanks for the suggestion. Changed.

> When we publish you will need to prepare a draft for publication with LC status as opposed to ED status, with pubrules, link and validity checks.

Updated the status to LC, passes checkers.

> I suggest we plan to publish 4 Feb (if that works for you and the team) with a 3 week last call, ending 25 February.


> We also should probably include a link to the test case and implementation information (I'm not sure but think there are ReSpec variables for these)
> tests: https://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/vibration/


> informative implementation information: http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/ImplementationStatus#Vibration_API


[Btw. Is there a guideline how such information should be represented in W3C specs? The HTML spec has implementation status per each feature inline.]

> we can discuss on call to confirm WG agrees on these details.

The LC snapshot is at:


[Identical with http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/Overview.html referred to in the CfC.]


Received on Friday, 31 January 2014 13:18:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:03 UTC