- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:17:29 +0000
- To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- CC: "<public-device-apis@w3.org>" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi, On 30 Jan 2014, at 16:47, Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com wrote: > Thanks Anssi > > One suggestion, change the status text from "Allow concurrent invocations in different browsing contexts" to "Specify how concurrent invocations in different browsing contexts are handled” Thanks for the suggestion. Changed. > When we publish you will need to prepare a draft for publication with LC status as opposed to ED status, with pubrules, link and validity checks. Updated the status to LC, passes checkers. > I suggest we plan to publish 4 Feb (if that works for you and the team) with a 3 week last call, ending 25 February. Updated. > We also should probably include a link to the test case and implementation information (I'm not sure but think there are ReSpec variables for these) > > tests: https://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/vibration/ Added. > informative implementation information: http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/ImplementationStatus#Vibration_API Added. [Btw. Is there a guideline how such information should be represented in W3C specs? The HTML spec has implementation status per each feature inline.] > we can discuss on call to confirm WG agrees on these details. The LC snapshot is at: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/LC3.html [Identical with http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/Overview.html referred to in the CfC.] Thanks, -Anssi
Received on Friday, 31 January 2014 13:18:18 UTC