- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 07:59:10 +0000
- To: "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>
- CC: W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On 22 Aug 2014, at 06:51, Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com> wrote: > Sorry for missing this mail. > >> From: Kostiainen, Anssi >> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 16:38 >> To: Zhang, Zhiqiang >> Cc: W3C Device APIs WG >> Subject: Re: Vibration test update (Re ACTION-701: DAP testing status) >> >> Hi Zhiqiang, >> >> On 14 Jul 2014, at 10:19, Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com> wrote: >> >>> ... we still miss tests for >>> >>> - do nothing when hidden >>> - cancel when dynamically hidden >>> - reinstate when dynamically shown >>> - invalid values >>> >>> If you have tests for these checkpoints or want to write some, feel free to >> submit them to >>> >>> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/vibration >> >> Please feel free to write test cases for these (I guess "reinstate..." can be >> dropped due to changes in the spec since the TODO was written), I'm happy >> to review them. > > OK, thank you. I will create some tests soon. Thanks for volunteering. If you have any questions, please ping this list. All - feel free to review the existing test suite, and suggest additional test cases to be added to the above list if you identify further testable assertions. >> As discussed, despite you being the Test Facilitator, we can still relax the >> rules in such a way that also you can write tests as long as someone else >> reviews them before you integrate them. > > Absolutely yes. Thanks, -Anssi
Received on Friday, 22 August 2014 08:00:34 UTC