W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > August 2014

Re: Vibration test update (Re ACTION-701: DAP testing status)

From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 07:59:10 +0000
To: "Zhang, Zhiqiang" <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>
CC: W3C Device APIs WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4518F449-3BEF-42E7-815A-395E6944E219@intel.com>
On 22 Aug 2014, at 06:51, Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com> wrote:

> Sorry for missing this mail.
> 
>> From: Kostiainen, Anssi
>> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 16:38
>> To: Zhang, Zhiqiang
>> Cc: W3C Device APIs WG
>> Subject: Re: Vibration test update (Re ACTION-701: DAP testing status)
>> 
>> Hi Zhiqiang,
>> 
>> On 14 Jul 2014, at 10:19, Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> ... we still miss tests for
>>> 
>>>   - do nothing when hidden
>>>   - cancel when dynamically hidden
>>>   - reinstate when dynamically shown
>>>   - invalid values
>>> 
>>> If you have tests for these checkpoints or want to write some, feel free to
>> submit them to
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/vibration
>> 
>> Please feel free to write test cases for these (I guess "reinstate..." can be
>> dropped due to changes in the spec since the TODO was written), I'm happy
>> to review them.
> 
> OK, thank you. I will create some tests soon.

Thanks for volunteering. If you have any questions, please ping this list.

All - feel free to review the existing test suite, and suggest additional test cases to be added to the above list if you identify further testable assertions.

>> As discussed, despite you being the Test Facilitator, we can still relax the
>> rules in such a way that also you can write tests as long as someone else
>> reviews them before you integrate them.
> 
> Absolutely yes.

Thanks,

-Anssi
Received on Friday, 22 August 2014 08:00:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:11 UTC