Re: Plan to progress "wake lock"/"standby API"

On August 11, 2014 at 3:22:35 PM, Frederick Hirsch (w3c@fjhirsch.com) wrote:
> >
> This approach means that the WG would work on an editors draft,  
> then agree to a FPWD transition.
>  
> Please indicate any support 

Yay from me :) We've put together a use cases document [1] and we are working on a rough spec at [2]. Please note that [2] is changing rapidly!  

[1] http://w3c-webmob.github.io/wake-lock-use-cases/
[2] http://w3c.github.io/screen-wake/

Received on Monday, 11 August 2014 19:26:40 UTC