RE: DAP-ISSUE-168: getBattery() vs. requestBattery() pattern [Battery Status API]

From: Kostiainen, Anssi <>

> To address this part of Domenic’s feedback, however, I suggest we revise the following normative prose:

LGTM, thanks!

> Is a promise that cannot reject (IOW “the user agent MUST NOT reject the promise ...”) a bad practice to be avoided at all cost?

Nope, that's fine! It's just like a function that can never throw.

Received on Friday, 8 August 2014 15:59:16 UTC