On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jean-Claude Dufourd < jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr> wrote: > JCD: If NSD requires modifications to SSDP, it will work with 0 devices > at the beginning. > But if implementers refuse to implement NSD spec as is, we will never be able to discover ANY type of device. So regardless of people preferences, we need to be pragmatic. As discussed in the other thread, we need to go for a default implementation that is strict even though this means not supporting legacy devices. We can imagine UA to hide behind a user setting the ability to expose also legacy devices, but that would be a second step. Of course use of NSD API in context where security is guaranteed in some other way (app stores?) could be not restricted in the same way, > This is a sure way to have a standard that will not be used. > I don't see how a standard that browser implementers refuse to implement is ever going to be useful.
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 11:18:38 UTC