W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > October 2013

Re: Vibration API strength (weaker/stronger)

From: Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 15:37:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAF40kP4+nh=0j=EAS_2hWARrUCLUr9xEQUY2bbjcNOaeX89Y7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Cc: "7raivis@inbox.lv" <7raivis@inbox.lv>, Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@chromium.org>, "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "jlebar@mozilla.com" <jlebar@mozilla.com>
Which platforms could support vibration strength? It would be nice to have
(not a must have I think) but for example android.os.Vibrator does not have
any way to control vibration strength.

Regards,

Michael



On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Kostiainen, Anssi <
anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote:

> On Aug 21, 2013, at 11:38 PM, 7raivis@inbox.lv wrote:
>
> > Vibration API strength proposal with stair-stepping/smooth volume
> reduce/increase:
>
> [...]
>
> > or the same in simplified version without strings:
> >
> >     navigator.vibrate([{200, [0, 80]}, {1000, 50, [0, 100, 0]}, {200,
> [50]}]);
> >
> > and single 1 s vibrate with 100 strength and without delay:
> >
> >     navigator.vibrate({1000});
>
> Thanks for your proposal.
>
> All - I'd like to hear if the group and implementers think we should try
> fit this (or something similar) in v1, or if this feature would be a better
> candidate for a v2 spec instead as suggested by Marcos [1]?
>
> Personally I think we may want to ship v1 first as is, gain more
> implementation experience, get more feedback from developers, and defer
> this feature to v2.
>
> I added a pointer to this proposal to the group's Future Work wiki [2] so
> we don't forget.
>
> Tracker, this relates to ISSUE-146.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Anssi
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Aug/0062.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/FutureWork
>
>
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 14:37:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:01 UTC