Hi, I reordered the steps 3 and 5 [1] in the 'processing vibration patterns' algorithm [2] to perform the likely cheaper operation first. Checking the length of the pattern is probably cheaper than checking the length of each entry, thus it makes sense to do the cheaper operation first. The new order: [[ 3. If the length of pattern exceeds an implementation-dependent limit, then return false and terminate these steps. [...] 5. If any entry of pattern exceeds an implementation-dependent limit, then return false and terminate these steps. ]] -Anssi [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2009/dap/vibration/Overview.src.html.diff?r1=1.4;r2=1.5;f=h [2] http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/#dfn-processing-vibration-patternsReceived on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 17:57:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:32:55 UTC