- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 07:09:19 +0000
- To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- CC: "<public-device-apis@w3.org>" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi Frederick, On Jun 4, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com wrote: > I'd propose adding a little more to the vibration introduction for clarity, as follows. > > After the existing text "The API is specifically designed to address use cases that require simple tactile feedback only. Use cases requiring more fine-grained control are out of scope for this specification." > > proposed edit is > > [[ > > This API is not meant to be used as a generic notification mechanism. Such use cases may be handled using the Web Notifications [notifications] specification. In addition, determining whether vibration is appropriate due to "silent mode" or other reasons is up to the calling application or notification mechanism and out of scope for this specification. > > ]] Thanks for the proposal. I slightly amended your proposal and updated the spec. Here's the updated introduction: [[ Introduction This section is non-normative. The API is specifically designed to address use cases that require simple tactile feedback only. Use cases requiring more fine-grained control are out of scope for this specification. This API is not meant to be used as a generic notification mechanism. Such use cases may be handled using the Web Notifications [notifications] specification. In addition, determining whether vibration is enabled is out of scope for this specification. ]] Please let know if you'd like to propose further edits to the introduction. Thanks, -Anssi
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2013 07:09:58 UTC