Anssi, Yes, I haven't had time to both learn the spec authoring process, the spec authoring language and also write the spec—while also keeping up with my extant commitments. I'm sorry to say that there was never much motivation here, since most of the copy/paste designs already have implementations. The whole thing felt like an exercise in futility, considering the lack of historic precedent in support of implementors wanting to support alternative designs or even consider dropping the existing APIs (especially where platform code, eg, b2g/gaia, has been written). Ironically, this is being closed just as my company has begun working with Mozilla on the b2g/gaia platform—where all of these APIs will become central to our solutions. Rick On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Anssi Kostiainen < anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi Rick, > > On 31.1.2013, at 10.44, Anssi Kostiainen wrote: > > [...] > > > I'm happy to help you get your alternative proposal drafted. A more > complete draft would help the working group participants and implementors > to discuss and evaluate it properly. > > We haven't heard back from you. I'd like to let you know that during our > weekly call yesterday we reviewed open Last Call comments for [1] and noted > your comment [2] was still open. In order to advance the spec [1] along the > Rec track, the group will close this comment now. > > -Anssi > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-proximity-20121206/ > [2] > https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/43696/WD-proximity-20121206/2740
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 19:44:35 UTC