- From: <7raivis@inbox.lv>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 21:58:19 +0300
- To: Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@chromium.org>
- Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com, public-device-apis@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CABj=UkLLFTqsz4P_Bkf2_fkGzpzYQ4awVUJMtOtu8+GfiCEjBA@mail.gmail.com>
Michael, what do you mean with specific on/off patterns? http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/ has nothing mentionned about it. Binyamin On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Michael van Ouwerkerk < mvanouwerkerk@chromium.org> wrote: > Note that while intensity is not controllable with this API, you can > increase duration and design specific on/off patterns. Not the same, but it > may help. > > Regards, > > Michael > > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:15 PM, <7raivis@inbox.lv> wrote: > >> Thanks, Frederick, for your feedback! >> Vibration strength control would improve UX, it is like to control sound >> volume. It shocks on starting loud music or strong vibration. If it would >> have option to start from peaceful quiet music, weak vibration, it would >> make a obviously strongly better UX. Old GSM devices still has such a >> examples. >> >> Binyamin >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:44 PM, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: >> >>> Please note that varying vibration strength may be beyond the goals of >>> this specification. The introduction states: >>> >>> "The API is specifically designed to address use cases that require >>> simple tactile feedback only. Use cases requiring more fine-grained control >>> are out of scope for this specification. This API is not meant to be used >>> as a generic notification mechanism. " >>> >>> It seems that varying strength is a complication that is not needed to >>> provide 'simple tactile feedback. What is the use case for adding vibration >>> strength and which implementations would support this? >>> >>> regards, Frederick >>> >>> Frederick Hirsch >>> Nokia >>> >>> >>> >>> On Aug 19, 2013, at 4:42 AM, ext 7raivis@inbox.lv wrote: >>> >>> בע"ה >>> >>> >>> Why the Vibration API http://www.w3.org/TR/vibration/ does not have >>> such a thing as strength (weaker/stronger)? I think it is an important >>> thing to add. >>> >>> >>> Binyamin >>> >>> >
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2013 18:59:18 UTC