- From: Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:19:35 +0100
- To: 7raivis@inbox.lv
- Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com, public-device-apis@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAF40kP7+5hiLC-NAaK5YH1OnKU70x4ffCFz3tTmrdNo2SodANg@mail.gmail.com>
Note that while intensity is not controllable with this API, you can increase duration and design specific on/off patterns. Not the same, but it may help. Regards, Michael On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:15 PM, <7raivis@inbox.lv> wrote: > Thanks, Frederick, for your feedback! > Vibration strength control would improve UX, it is like to control sound > volume. It shocks on starting loud music or strong vibration. If it would > have option to start from peaceful quiet music, weak vibration, it would > make a obviously strongly better UX. Old GSM devices still has such a > examples. > > Binyamin > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:44 PM, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: > >> Please note that varying vibration strength may be beyond the goals of >> this specification. The introduction states: >> >> "The API is specifically designed to address use cases that require >> simple tactile feedback only. Use cases requiring more fine-grained control >> are out of scope for this specification. This API is not meant to be used >> as a generic notification mechanism. " >> >> It seems that varying strength is a complication that is not needed to >> provide 'simple tactile feedback. What is the use case for adding vibration >> strength and which implementations would support this? >> >> regards, Frederick >> >> Frederick Hirsch >> Nokia >> >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2013, at 4:42 AM, ext 7raivis@inbox.lv wrote: >> >> בע"ה >> >> >> Why the Vibration API http://www.w3.org/TR/vibration/ does not have >> such a thing as strength (weaker/stronger)? I think it is an important >> thing to add. >> >> >> Binyamin >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2013 13:20:09 UTC