- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:39:53 +0100
- To: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On Thursday, April 25, 2013 at 3:27 PM, JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA wrote: > > > > > > > > I should note that Anssi did ask for me to prepare alternate proposals > > (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2012Dec/0038.html) > > , > > and Doug Turner did seem somewhat interested. Any motivation and > > momentum was killed upon learning that implementors weren't interested > > in doing better: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2013Jan/att-0024/mi > > nutes-dap-2013-01-09.html#item06 > > . Marcos and I still need to wrap up our alternate spec, but there is no > > rush now. > > > > I would be more than happy to help in rescuing the original Sensors API > proposal successfully implemented as a Phone Plugin one year ago > > http://cantera.orgfree.com/specs/sensors/latest/ > > That spec would not only allow to deal with device sensors but also to > remote sensors in the emerging Web of Things domain That would be good, but the proposal that Rick put forward is a bit different from that one. He is proposing better organization and abstractions than generic connectors. Take a look at https://github.com/rwldrn/johnny-five -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 14:40:23 UTC