Re: [sensors] Proximity Events

On 21.5.2012, at 18.09, ext Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

> It's the same problem and suffers from the same conceptual flaw (if you
> add a second listener there is no reason to trigger the first listener).
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2011Nov/0016.html
> was the last I heard about the matter I believe.

I added a similar note to the Proximity Events draft:

[[

Implementations may fire the event if they have reason to believe that the page does not have sufficiently fresh data.

]]

Feel free to suggest a better wording.

-Anssi

Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 06:47:43 UTC