- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 17:24:14 +0100
- To: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org
On Friday, May 11, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Doug Turner wrote: > Thanks Marcos for summarizing. Great stuff. > > One point - These are not mutually exclusive proposals. Right, I was not intending them to be. > On the list we discussed immediately proceeding with exposing the min/max/value event -- this is shipping in at least one implementation. We should just discuss the name of the near/far event, briefly discuss what near and far mean, and spec that. Ok, lets do that in a separate thread. > There is no need for a long drawn out discussion about use cases. Np, was not meaning it to be drawn out. Lets not kill the thread because we will need that stuff to progress the spec (specially showing that the group had some use cases and requirements is important when the spec hits CR, so that will need to go into the spec eventually). -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 16:24:49 UTC