- From: N.V.Balaji <nv.balaji@samsung.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 11:03:15 +0530
- To: Doug Turner <dougt@mozilla.com>, Niklas Widell <niklas.widell@ericsson.com>
- Cc: "Carr, Wayne" <wayne.carr@intel.com>, "Tran, Dzung D" <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-device-apis@w3.org
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Doug Turner" <dougt@mozilla.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 10:01 PM To: "Niklas Widell" <niklas.widell@ericsson.com> Cc: "Carr, Wayne" <wayne.carr@intel.com>; "Tran, Dzung D" <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>; "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>; <public-device-apis@w3.org> Subject: Re: System Level APIs draft proposal > > One of my complaints of the DAP was that it was a wide sweeping WG that > had way too many deliverables. I tend to think smaller WGs with tighter > focus work a lot better. I agree. I am not aware of the cost and effort involved in setting up a WG, however, small and focused working groups are likely to gather more mass than one group with wide spread focus. > Spawning off a WG to work specially on System Level APIs seems like it is > a good thing. However, I am not sure about all of the politics of > something like that. > > Doug
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 05:34:08 UTC