- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:18:39 -0400
- To: ext Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
- CC: "public-device-apis@w3.org WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, public-webevents@w3.org
Hi Anssi, All, On 10/11/11 5:10 AM, ext Anssi Kostiainen wrote: > [ cc: public-webevents ] > > Hi All, > > Mozilla has done some early prototyping work around vibration API in Gecko [1]. Given that the Device APIs group has "an API to manage vibration" in its Charter [2] I believe it makes sense to look at this topic in this group soonish. For this reason, I added Vibrator API as one of the potential topics for the upcoming TPAC F2F [3]. > > There has been discussion on the public-webevents ML around this [4], and the conclusion seems to be that the Device APIs group could be the home for the potential spec. I could volunteer to be an editor to gets things moving, but I'm also happy to hand over the spec to eager co-editors. Given an "API to manage vibration" is an explicit deliverable for DAPI, I think the conclusion re scope is very clear: vibration API is DAPI's spec. If someone in Web Events wants to contribute to this spec, they need to join the DAPI WG. > Chairs - Do you think we could fit a slot for this topic somewhere so that it would work for both the groups? My recommendation is for DAPI to put this API on its agenda (if so desired) and going forward, we set an expectation that DAPI's list (public-device-apis) will be used for all related discussions. Frederick, Robin - agreed? -AB > > -Anssi > > [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679966 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/07/DeviceAPICharter > [3] http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/F2F_Agenda_3-4_November_2011,_Santa_Clara_(TPAC) > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011OctDec/0022.html
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 11:19:21 UTC