- From: Deepanshu gautam <deepanshu.gautam@huawei.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:42:13 +0000
- To: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Anssi Kostiainen [mailto:anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 4:36 PM > To: Deepanshu gautam > Cc: Robin Berjon; public-device-apis@w3.org public-device-apis@w3.org > Subject: Re: [vibration] Preliminary thoughts on the vibrator spec > > On 23.11.2011, at 10.07, ext Deepanshu gautam wrote: > > > Please refer to my following posts (for which I didn't get any > response) > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device- > apis/2011Nov/0181.html > > > > The use case is simple: As a developer I want to know whether the > Vibrator is ON or OFF (at native layer), before trying to vibrate my > app. And, Since I'm using DAP VibrationAPI I expect that same API to > provide me with this functionality. > > You cannot always expect feature parity between Web APIs and native > APIs due to different security models employed. [DG] What security breach you foresee here? I heard that fingerprinting is not an issue here. > > -Anssi
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 08:43:33 UTC