- From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:36:14 +0100
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:32 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > During that discussion, it was argued that a callback pattern would > probably have been a better approach for DeviceOrientation due to the > need of powering hardware and getting first event upon registration — > Robin, maybe something to document in the API cookbook after further > discussion with Geo/Hixie/Anne ? Yes, that sounds like a good idea, especially since there is already a section in the document discussing related matters. And you know what's just *great* about the fact that we're using GitHub? I can easily accept pull requests! :) > To work around this potential mis-design, specific wording was added to > the DeviceOrientation spec: "Implementations may fire the event if they > have reason to believe the page does not have sufficiently fresh data" It may just be me but that really smells like weasel wording. Maybe this is LC feedback fodder? -- Robin Berjon robineko — hired gun, higher standards http://robineko.com/ @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 10:36:41 UTC