Re: [vibra] Vibration API

+1

El 16/11/11 07:51, "Deepanshu gautam" <deepanshu.gautam@huawei.com>
escribió:

>Is it so very monumental to add simple (not multiple vibration control)
>Intensity functionality in V1? If not, I would suggest to have it in V1.
>I think there is a market need for this one.
>
>More on:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Nov/0005.html
>
>
>Regards
>
>Deepanshu Gautam
>Service Standards, Huawei Software
>T: +86 25 5260008 M: +86 135 85147627
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Anssi Kostiainen [mailto:anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 5:37 PM
>To: ext Scott Graham
>Cc: Tab Atkins Jr.; public-device-apis@w3.org WG; public-webevents@w3.org
>Subject: Re: [vibra] Vibration API
>
>Hi Scott,
>
>On 14.11.2011, at 19.33, ext Scott Graham wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Anssi Kostiainen
>><anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm happy to hear your use cases that may not be served with what we
>>have. But please note that for v1 we've agreed to be rather tight in
>>scope and defer more advanced functionality to v2.
>>
>> I guess the obvious one is some measure of intensity of vibration, or
>>(similarly?) controlling individual vibration motors separately, where
>>each might be intended for different frequencies.
>
>I've added your proposal to the list of things to look at in v2:
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/FutureWork
>
>Feel free to amend the wiki yourself.
>
>-Anssi
>


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx

Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 09:32:54 UTC