W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > November 2011

Re: [vibration] Preliminary thoughts on the vibrator spec

From: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:38:27 +0200
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>, <public-device-status@w3.org>
Message-Id: <FBD335AF-131A-4860-BBB6-67AC00B8075D@nokia.com>
To: ext Justin Lebar <jlebar@mozilla.com>
On 11.11.2011, at 23.16, ext Justin Lebar wrote:

>> An implementation should be allowed to disable vibration in any way if it wants to for security or privacy reasons.
> Jonas> I think "is" would be more correct than "should be".
> This is still too restrictive.  An implementation may also disable
> vibration just because the user asked.  Also, I don't know what it
> means to disable vibration "in any way."
> How about we add a step to the algorithm, between steps 8 and 9:
> "9) An implementation may abort the algorithm at this point.
> "Non-normative note: For example, an implementation might abort the
> algorithm because the user has set a preference indicating that pages
> at a given origin should never be able to vibrate the page, or an
> implementation might cap the total amount of time a page may cause the
> device to vibrate and reject requests in excess of this limit."

This looks good to me. I added the step and the non-normative note you proposed to the spec.


Received on Monday, 14 November 2011 13:38:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:32:32 UTC