- From: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:59:05 -0700
- To: ext JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>
- Cc: "public-device-apis@w3.org WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, public-device-status@w3.org
On 1.11.2011, at 16.34, ext JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA wrote: > vibrate(0) means no vibration. > > In addition probably you are going to need something to indicate what > vibration you want to cancel as there can be more than one pending > vibration request There's no concept of pending vibration request in the current draft. In other words, only one vibration operation is active at a time and any subsequent vibrate() invocation will cancel the pre-existing operation, if any. See the tests 3 and 4a: https://bug679966.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=567875 Do you have a use case in mind for pending vibration requests? -Anssi
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 03:59:53 UTC