- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 11:55:46 +0200
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, public-device-apis@w3.org
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 11:19 +0200, Robin Berjon a écrit : > > Unless the group is already heavily invested in CVS, I think there > are many benefits of using Mercurial (as is now done by at least the > HTML WG and WebApps). I tend to view DAP test suites as falling under > the Open Web Platform and as such, my preference would be to minimize > the differences with the other groups' testing infrastructure choices. > > I agree with Art. Hg has quite a few advantages over CVS, and in fact > I wouldn't be averse to progressively moving all our drafts there. OK, I've thus created a new Mercurial repository for DAP: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/ and moved the tests there (with redirects and links on dev.w3.org as much as possible) I've also made it so that tests get deployed on w3c-test.org: http://w3c-test.org/dap/contacts/tests/ http://w3c-test.org/dap/contacts/tests/test-cases/ (which should address your concern below: > The only downside I've seen is that the dvcs server is harder to > access over the Web than the dev one ) Dom
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2011 09:56:04 UTC