RE: DAP 15-16 March 2011 F2F Highlights

Hi, Art and Frederick,

Ok, I see that Google and Mozilla no longer are members of DAP. I will contact the editor's from Google and Mozilla on this issue.

Regards
  Claes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
> Sent: den 23 mars 2011 20:02
> To: ext Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com; Nilsson, Claes1
> Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org
> Subject: Re: DAP 15-16 March 2011 F2F Highlights
> 
> On Mar/23/2011 11:40 AM, ext Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com wrote:
> > Yes that makes sense, thanks for the good wording. We probably should
> also include Intents in that item as well?
> >
> > We also need to consider the impact of the BBC proposal and whether
> it can be modularized with a piece that makes sense for DAP - I forgot
> to include that in the list as it  has been a mail list discussion.
> >
> > On Mar 23, 2011, at 10:31 AM, ext Nilsson, Claes1 wrote:
> >> * An API that enables Web content to discover resources and services,
> no matter where they are hosted, and gain permission to interact with
> them. Such a mechanism is for example the Web Introducer (http://web-
> send.org/introducer/).
> 
> Would you please clarify the Patent Policy commitments for this "Web
> Introducer" document?
> 
> According the DAP WG's Patent Policy Status, some of the contributing
> Editors are employed by W3C Members that are Not members of the DAP WG.
> As such, these Members (Google and Mozilla) have not agreed to the
> W3C's
> Patent Policy for this document, yet it appears you are proposing this
> document be added to DAP's charter:
> 
>     http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/43696/status
> 
> -AB

Received on Thursday, 24 March 2011 09:19:21 UTC