- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 14:01:07 +0000
- To: <robin@berjon.com>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Personally I'd suggest we flag it and have a web index page for obsoleted documents that isn't the home page. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Jul 5, 2011, at 9:18 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: > On Jul 5, 2011, at 12:02 , Anssi Kostiainen wrote: >>> I saw this design pattern link shared >>> on the whatwg irc channel recently and was hoping it would also deal >>> with this type of pattern. http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/design-patterns/ >>> Perhaps there's a more up-to-date or relevant place I should be looking? >> >> That document is an early Editor's Draft, and in its current form it's vague and incomplete, and thus obsolete. We should make that more obvious (currently, it is listed as "exploratory work" on the DAP home page, and the doc abstract is misleading by stating that "these are the requirements for the API Design Patterns work undertaken by the DAP WG"). > > Any objections to putting a big red warning at the top indicating that that is an obsolete document that was never approved by the group? Or perhaps even removing it? > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 14:02:08 UTC