- From: <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:11:08 +0000
- To: Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu.dumitriu@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org
Dear Sergiu Dumitriu , The Device APIs Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Battery Status API published on 29 Nov 2011. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments! The Working Group's response to your comment is included below. Please review it carefully and let us know by email at public-device-apis@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 9 December 2011. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track. Thanks, For the Device APIs Working Group, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux Dave Raggett W3C Staff Contacts 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/4ED5C11D.6010803@gmail.com 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-battery-status-20111129/ ===== Your comment on 4. BatteryManager Interface [NoInterfaceObject] interface...: > An extra editorial comment: in the BatteryManager interface, the level > attribute should be listed after the dischargingTime attribute, to be > in > line with the order of their definition, and since it's a more logical > > order to keep charging and discharging time together. Working Group Resolution (LC-2576): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Nov/0261.html Fixed, see: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/battery-status.html ----
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2011 17:11:14 UTC