- From: Bryan Sullivan <blsaws@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:49:53 +0200
- To: public-device-apis@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTikiphm8jmJtFF2g=Des5w4YLSvF74yuXgJ3aGY5@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry if this is duplicate - I'm trying to switch over to using gmail for W3C discussions but the messages don't seem to be getting through. +++ FYI - I am using this email address now, to reduce the overhead on my desktop email. This looks fine as a FPWD. I will send some other comments to the list. Here is the only comment needing to be fixed prior to publication: The version/published/draft links are to the HTML Media Capture API. Bryan -----Original Message----- From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 9:38 PM To: public-device-apis@w3.org Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com Subject: CfC: The Media Capture API FPWD Hi all, Robin is away, but we agreed at the teleconference today to start a call for consensus on the Media Capture API, ending next week ( publication will include the change from ACTION-267 to add the note regarding ISSUE-101 to the text, this has not been done yet.) [1] This is a call for consensus to see if there are any objections to publishing the Media Capture API as a FPWD. The draft can be read at: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/camera/Overview-API.html Note that there is no requirement on API FPWDs to be perfect - if they were perfect we'd go straight to LC. They need to be good for broader review, and reasonably feature-complete. Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1). Please send feedback before next Tuesday (Sept 6) as much as possible. Thanks! regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch, Nokia Co-Chair, W3C DAP Working Group [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Sep/att-0007/ minutes-2010-09-01.html#item08 ------ End of Forwarded Message
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2010 07:40:27 UTC