- From: Philip Gladstone <pgladstone@cisco.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:37:01 -0400
- CC: public-device-apis@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4BAA85FD.1040206@cisco.com>
On 24-Mar-10 11:00, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > > Thanks for looking into this! 2 comments: > - I think we should choose either the Olson identifier, or the URI one, > but not mix them both up in a single field; I would personally suggest > using the Olson identifier for v1 > - I'm slightly uncomfortable with binding the whole event to a timezone > rather than to the specific dates that are defined in it (start, end, > reminders, and recurrence limits); use cases that require binding to the > dates rather than events are somewhat convoluted, but it seems like bad > design to separate a datetime from its timezone in general. Also, since > we mentioned other cases where we would need a "timezoned" datetime > (e.g. reception times for messages), I still think we should work on > TimezoneDate object rather than adding this on the side for events > > Dom > > There are certainly calendar events that make sense with differing starting and ending timezones. For example, United 177 leaves Boston at 11:15 America/New_York and arrives in San Francisco at 15:00 America/Los_Angeles -- and this is how the flight will appear in your reservation. This is the 'obvious' form of the calendar event that corresponds to my flight. Thus I support having a timezoned datetime object rather than trying to split out the timezone into a separate field. Philip -- Philip Gladstone Distinguished Engineer Product Development pgladstone@cisco.com Phone: +1 978-ZEN-TOAD (+1 978 936 8623) Google: +1 978 800 1010 Ham radio: N1DQ Cisco.com - http://www.cisco.com This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 21:37:36 UTC