W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > March 2010

RE: Calendar FPWD

From: Suresh Chitturi <schitturi@rim.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:45:10 -0600
Message-ID: <D37CC1B151BD57489F4F89609F168FE804B026B8@XCH01DFW.rim.net>
To: "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>

Suresh Chitturi
Research In Motion


-----Original Message-----
From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-device-apis-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Robin Berjon
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:10 AM
To: public-device-apis@w3.org
Subject: CfC: Calendar FPWD

Hi all,

this is a call for consensus to see if there are any objections to
publishing the Calendar API as a FPWD. The group is aware of a number of
outstanding issues, and the overarching issue of whether to make a
Powerbox-based API is still standing, but at least some of us feel that
there's value in getting feedback early and often.

The draft can be read at:


Note that there is no requirement on FPWDs to be perfect - if they were
perfect we'd go straight to LC. They need to be good for broader review,
and reasonably feature-complete.

Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but
positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1).


Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/

This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2010 22:46:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:42 UTC