- From: Nilsson, Claes1 <Claes1.Nilsson@sonyericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:21:33 +0100
- To: 'Max Froumentin' <maxfro@opera.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Ok for me assuming that you mean moving section B out but keeping the ECMAScript examples in the main specification. Regards Claes > -----Original Message----- > From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Max Froumentin > Sent: torsdag den 4 mars 2010 12:28 > To: public-device-apis@w3.org > Subject: Moving Requirements/Use-cases sections away from the main > specification > > I would like to make the case for separate Requirements/Use Cases > documents. For 2 reasons: > > - a MUST in the requirements section doesn't mean the same thing as a > MUST in the main specification. The former applies to the specification > itself while the latter applies to a user agent. That could be > confusing. > > - Splitting makes the specification shorter. Use cases may still make > sense in the specification to help users, but they should be very > simple > and just shown as examples. > > feedback? > > Max.
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 12:22:09 UTC