W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > July 2010

Re: HTML Media Capture draft from Device APIs and Policy Working Group

From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:08:58 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimKtinoBcJ+fO5VO7Nn5BF-qfEvgJvOboBcPhp5@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi Anne,

Thanks for the comments!

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:21:29 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>> But I am not sure I understand what prevents you from doing both. You
>>> can render your two buttons for the existing millions of pages. If
>>> some new pages do specify the capture parameter, you can just hide the
>>> irrelevant button. What is the drawback to that?
>> That could be an ok solution I agree.
> It seems better to me to start out simple first.

Ok, but is 'capture' that complex / complicated? It seems to me very
easy to implement and use.

> Like Jonas I'm not too
> convinced the capture parameter is really justified.

I see. What would it take to convince you? We have a real world
application presenting a pretty reasonable use case for it.

Received on Monday, 26 July 2010 14:09:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:32:22 UTC