- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:11:20 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, public-device-apis@w3.org
It seems like this specification has one issues list in tracker, and one in the document itself. I suggest that we should rather have a *single* issues list; I'd be happy to see that implemented by having the issues from tracker reflected in the document. Thanks, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> On 21 Jan 2010, at 18:48, Robin Berjon wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a Call for Consensus to publish a FPWD of the System Information API (http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/). > > Please review the current draft which Max updated earlier today, and make the comments you believe you need to make before next week's call, at which point we'll make the decision to publish or not. > > Note that there is no requirement on FPWDs to be perfect — if they were perfect we'd go straight to LC. They need to be good for broader review, and reasonably feature-complete. > > Where CfCs are concerned, silence is considered to be assent, but positive support is preferred (even if simply with a +1). > > Thanks! > > -- > Robin Berjon > robineko — hired gun, higher standards > http://robineko.com/ > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2010 18:11:22 UTC