- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:54:41 -0500
- To: ext Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Thanks for writing this up Robin. So if I understand correctly, some of the possible issues with LRest include - the potential need for using a different protocol that isn't widely used (Bayeux Comet protocol), - use of a library to mask XMLHttpRequest details (is there open source here?), - some more slightly complex and careful coding required, potential quality risk - the need to create a URI scheme, probably opaque, and - a performance cost of URI resolution. - JSON definitions (an issue anyway, either approach?) The benefit is the potential so support both widget and web cases and allow pluggable authorization, though we still need to work through the reality of that with an example. Do you have a pointer to Stephen's proposal regarding database approach? Thanks regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Jan 20, 2010, at 9:32 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: > Hi all, > > as discussed previously, here are my notes about this specific issue: > > http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/docs/virtual-ws.html > > Comments welcome! > > -- > Robin Berjon > robineko — hired gun, higher standards > http://robineko.com/ > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 14:56:57 UTC